CONCEALED WEAPONS: A RIGHT? An Ohio judge has ruled that Ohio's law prohibiting the carrying of concealed weapons violates the state constitution. It's not entirely clear from the news report how much this is a right-to-bear-arms case and how much it's a due-process/right-to-self-defense case. But it's interesting -- and, I think, indicative of a change in public opinion. A decision like this would have been far less likely a few years ago.Thanks to Glenn Reynolds of InstaPundit.com.
CONCEALED WEAPONS: A RIGHT? An
Categories
Monthly Archives
- June 2009 (11)
- May 2009 (2)
- April 2009 (1)
- March 2009 (2)
- January 2009 (6)
- December 2008 (16)
- November 2008 (6)
- October 2008 (4)
- September 2008 (6)
- August 2008 (3)
- July 2008 (1)
- June 2008 (17)
- May 2008 (1)
- April 2008 (1)
- November 2007 (7)
- October 2007 (3)
- June 2007 (2)
- May 2007 (3)
- April 2007 (10)
- March 2007 (19)
- February 2007 (6)
- January 2007 (1)
- November 2006 (3)
- October 2006 (3)
- September 2006 (4)
- August 2006 (1)
- April 2006 (2)
- March 2006 (1)
- February 2006 (1)
- January 2006 (6)
- December 2005 (3)
- October 2005 (1)
- August 2005 (1)
- March 2005 (1)
- January 2005 (1)
- November 2004 (1)
- August 2004 (2)
- April 2004 (1)
- February 2004 (3)
- November 2003 (1)
- September 2003 (9)
- July 2003 (3)
- June 2003 (8)
- January 2003 (1)
- December 2002 (1)
- November 2002 (5)
- October 2002 (3)
- September 2002 (7)
- August 2002 (13)
- July 2002 (6)
- May 2002 (3)
- April 2002 (3)
- March 2002 (40)
- February 2002 (124)
- January 2002 (115)
- November 2001 (2)
- October 2001 (3)
- September 2001 (9)
- August 2001 (5)
- July 2001 (3)
- June 2001 (4)
- May 2001 (14)
Pages
- personal
Search
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by Daniel Hagan published on January 10, 2002 5:21 PM.
What a day for the was the previous entry in this blog.
Israeli v. Arabs: Round....hell, who is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
